I
see many people who ignore that Shake-speare (as it appears in almost
half the works published between 1598 and 1604) is a pseudonym of the
mastermind of the English Renaissance Edward de Vere attack this fact
with the allegation that it is a conspiracy. I have no doubt that
they think themselves smarter by following the main theory that an
illiterate frontman called William Shakspere was the true author,
although his death in 1616 was not celebrated nor mourned in England,
and his parents and children were all illiterate. Ben Jonson was
mourned when he died, and was not half the author Shake-speare was.
Something is smelling funny here. Is this fact digested? Most people
ignore it.
But
the point of these words is that this very same people that laugh at
the possibility that Shake-speare (the Shaker of Spears) was a man
forced to be forever banned to claim his works because it implies a
conspiracy (and the Virgin Queen Elizabeth I not being virgin is here the reason, with
the new Stuarts now reigning in England as the power that controls
that prohibition) are themselves believers in a hidden God who
created the world as a way to test humans. Is his fact digested? Most
people ignore it.
That
is, if you think a conspiracy this huge like Queen Elizabeth I having
had children (and one of them was Edward de Vere, aka Shake-speare)
is impossible, you should explain to me how the majority of people
believe in a hidden God who has created the greatest jumbo conspiracy
in the world.
As
I am a naturalist (atheist with spirituality), I may agree that it is
impossible to believe that a benevolent God should have created the
whole Cosmos just to locate some mammals in a tiny rock around an
average star, inside a medium-size galaxy among millions and millions
of galaxies, just to have some theater running where he is the audience
and the critic and is having fun. I agree this conspiracy makes no
sense. But here is where the majority of people surprises me: they
believe in this jumbo conspiracy blindly.
How
can these critics of any conspiracy think that Shake-speare could not
have been a great Lord in hiding writing about State matters with a
pseudonym (he used many others), when they revere anything coming
from a book called the Bible were God is creating a Cosmic
conspiracy, where the greatest secret is that he is not to be seen
and all his rules are different from place to place, time to time,
and book to book? The question has an easy answer: those who
criticize a theory always forget their own one. There is no absolute
theory, only theories who are better or more correct to the facts.
Now, if you are one of the believers in a religion (and there are
thousands of different religions around the world, and those who are
invented each day), you should ask yourself: How can this Cosmic
conspiracy be considered a serious theory accepted by sane people,
including myself, of course?
And
the answer is: the world is a madhouse, and the first thing you learn
when you have been learning to think deeply on the facts of the world
is this: when you do not want something to be changed, you ignore it.
Ignorance is bliss. But not for me.
Göngora et labora...
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario