The True Scientific Method and the Moon Landing.

I denied the USA Moon landing when I got to know that no evidence was given by a third, impartial party. The only evidence comes from the NASA reports. Very well. For a scientific mind like me, who has been studying science for long years and want to write a book on Evolutionary Psychology, this smells funny. Why no one has gone to the Moon except NASA?

   There is a problem here that we have to understand. The Cold War, President Nixonʼs mentality of cheating and lying while continuing the war in Vietnam. All goes to show that there is a reason for this quite remarkable achievement. The Moon Landing of 1969 was that evidence that went to show that the USA were on the front of science and technology. I may invite you now to learn something about Elizabeth Holmes and how she fooled everyone (from senators to former presidents) to believe in her new technology. But there is no need. Because science is based on experiment.

   After some conversations with some friends I have got to know what to say in this rather ackward matter. I do not care who is saying that the Van Allen beltsʼs radiation is not harmful (they are, and very much so each second you are in them). I do not care if you know of some scientist who says (no matter his authority or University grade) that going to the Moon is easy. My main concern as a scientific person (freelance scientific person) is to know if that data on the Moon landing has been replicated, and the same results has been achieved. If that scientist who says that the radiation is not dangerous has not gone to the Moon, or is not using another source for his data except NASA, his words are empty. Like the Pope saying that God is real and is Christian only. How does the Pope know that? Because he is using his only source, the Bible. In this case, the Bible is NASA, and they stand alone the whole world over. Imagine the Spaniards discovering America and no one else has been able to go in 50 years since 1492: no English, no Dutch, no French, no one. Can you believe the Spaniards discovering another new continent if even they have no technology to go there after 50 years since they did so? No.

   And that is why I do not believe the scientific results of NASA on the Moon landing. If nobody else has gone to the Moon; if nobody else has got the NASAʼs results, if there is no objective (in the Popperian sense), impartial data that verify NASAʼs results, it is not science. Period.

   That is all I wanted to say. I think it is safe to say that we did not go to the Moon. And we did not go to the Moon because space is radiocative. Now we are told that it is not so dangerous, not so radioactive. Armostrong and Co. did not report any changes on their radioactive takings after their travel. This is a scientific imposibility. Some should have come in 1969. They told us nothing about this. But this is not important here. The important  thing is the scientific method.

   Until another scientist or scientific organization from another country verifies the data of NASAʼs Moon landing, I can say, as a scientific reader and lover, that the Moon landing is a fake, or at least, in doubt, in need of verification, and until that moment arrives, I do not accept it as a scientific fact. You can take a look at this video below to see the absurd words a NASAʼs spokeman is saying now about our current technology. But the moral of the story is this: with no impartial, verifiable, third-party experiment coming on this issue, there is not scientific reason to believe it. I do not care if an authority (a famous astronomer, a popular astrophysicist) is saying otherwise. The scientific method is above their own authority and above the infallible Pope. As Richard Feynman said once: if the experiment does not confirm your data, it is wrong. It does not matter how good you are, how beautiful you are, how good your name or your post could be, how powerful or how free from prejudices. It is wrong. Show us the verifying data of the experiment. Show us another country, entity or person going to the Moon apart from NASA. That is the scientific method. Period.

   In the meantime, we know that the Van Allen belts are radioactive. And they are very much so. No one else has gone through them because we have no technology to do so now (and we did not have it in 1969). Can you lie about such a great technological achievement? Take a look at Elizabeth Holmes and laugh. Now we cannot go to Mars because of the Van Allen belts. And we have destroyed our 1969 NASA technology (!!). Really? I disagree, NASA. Be honest. Be scientific. Let another experiment confirm or deny your results. In the meantime, my answer is this: no impartial experiment confirming your results? No Moon landing accepted as scientific fact. As easy as that. Read some Popper on the scientific method if you have some doubts here. Science is this honest and impartial, this hard. Ask Elizabeth Holmes about the scientific method and see her deep voice coming from the dark side of the Moon.