This
is a very good quote for my book in process Naturalismo y
Psicología Evolutiva. I leave it here for its use in the future (my emphasis):
By
raising the topic of the biology of rape in a conversation with
another, one can determine if the person has consistent scientific
objectivity or not. It can be used as an acid test of whether a
person has interest in knowing or may be blinded by ideological
convictions.
We
hypothesize that people have a psychological adaptation whose
function is to disable the mind’s reasoning and thereby prevent
personal acceptance of ideas that are perceived contrary to the
ideology of the perceiver’s community. This hypothetical adaptation
is the “knowledge destroyer.” Its functional design is to prevent
acceptance of an idea that is not consistent with one’s ideology by
garbling the logic and evidence that the idea entails. Thus, humans
may be designed as a result of evolution by selection to think
illogically and unreasonably about politically loaded topics such as
rape in biological perspective. The existence of the knowledge
destroyer would be supported by evidence that people with various
ideologies that most oppose evolutionary ideas being applied to
people’s behavior would show significantly greater lapses of reason
when evaluating a sequence of logic in an evolutionary vignette
involving human behavior than when evaluating logic in other types of
vignettes. It may be that the knowledge destroyer also is behind the
great difficulty many people have understanding the fact that culture
and biology are not a dichotomy and that in reality culture is
biology. Culture is the behavior of people in a place and time and
biology is the scientific study of all life, including all behavior.
~see the article HERE.
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario