I have been reading about this topic for a year now, I think. I read some books, talk with other friends about it, and arrived at the conclusion that there is no scientific reason to believe that human beings landed on the Moon, nor in 1969, nor up to today. If you land on the Moon in 1969, your information may be secret, but your technology is going to be shared and be replicated. Many other countries by today should have landed on the Moon. But only one nation, and one organisation, NASA, have done so. This is contrary to scientific practice. In science, if I cannot replicate your theory nor to falsify it, it is not science but pseudo-science. Popper can be of help to you. Imagine that one organisation says that has the cure for cancer but that the information is lost, missing, destroyed or hold secret from others. Imagine also that no other organisation is able to cure cancer in some forty years after that scientific discovery. In that case, we would be able to assert that the cure for cancer has not been attained, and that there is no information offered to check (confirm, replicate, falsify) if that cure is true or not. Same with NASA and the Moon Landing.
But there is even more. When the Google Lunar X-Prize competition offered some 20 million dollars for any private participant to send a machine to the Moon and send a video of it, they also increased the prize if any participant could record the sites of the NASA landings. That confirmation would have been a scientific evidence of those landings. What did NASA do? It recommended the participants in the Google competition to stay away from their sites, alleging that it could disrupt the remains of those sites. Thus, again, it is confirmed that NASA is not a scientific organisation, and avoids playing by the scientific rules. You can see this point very clearly in the documentary below, among many other points worth considering apart from the one that I have been talking about here, the one concerning the scientific logic, or methodology.
But there is even more. When the Google Lunar X-Prize competition offered some 20 million dollars for any private participant to send a machine to the Moon and send a video of it, they also increased the prize if any participant could record the sites of the NASA landings. That confirmation would have been a scientific evidence of those landings. What did NASA do? It recommended the participants in the Google competition to stay away from their sites, alleging that it could disrupt the remains of those sites. Thus, again, it is confirmed that NASA is not a scientific organisation, and avoids playing by the scientific rules. You can see this point very clearly in the documentary below, among many other points worth considering apart from the one that I have been talking about here, the one concerning the scientific logic, or methodology.
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario