Nabokov and *Pnin*: Trying to Sound Checkhovian.




The novel Pnin, after the scandal of Lolita, is Chekhovian. There are some good lines on philosophy (Vintage International Edition, p. 89), some tears of Pnin when he realizes that he will be out of job at the university (p. 172) that reminded me specially of a kind mind like Chekhovʼs, mentioned four pages later, and then the last chapter, where the narrator tells us that Pnin is mediocre and his wife a bad poetess who tried to have a relationship with him in the past, after which he married Pnin. No book of Nabokov is less Nabokovian as Pnin. The result is flat, a flop, leaving our mind with the taste of failure and its symbol: Pnin the scholar. A few yellow paragraphs underlined some twenty years ago to which I added some today, when I re-read the work, are worth mentioning. For example:

Unless a film of flesh envelop us, we die. Man exists only insofar as he is separated from his surroundings. The cranium is a space-travelerʼs helmet. Stay inside or you perish. Death is divestement, death is communion. It may be wonderful to mix with the landscape, but to do so is the end of the tender ego” (p. 20). A Nabokovian riposte against politics and social life.

Genius is non-conformity” (p. 89). I rather like that other line of his where he tells us that “Genius is an African who dreames up snow” (The Gift, Vintage International Edition, p. 193).

I never cared much for Bolotov and his philosophical works, which so oddly combine the obscure and the trite; the manʼs achievement is perhaps a mountain—but a mountain of platitudes” (p. 120). Lines that can be said of many a philosophical work, and that show that fame in academia goes with panache, character, selling yourself in a grand way. Hegel is here the best example.

The three of them stood for a moment gazing at the stars.

ʻAll of these are worlds,ʼ said Hagen.

ʻOr else,ʼ said Clemens with a yawn, ʻa frightful mess. I suspect it is really a fluorescent corpse, and we are inside it.ʼ This cosmogonical thought is exactly the one we see Sebastian Knight expressing (The Real Life of Sebastian Knight, Vintage International Edition, p. 137: “Years later Sebastian wrote that gazing at the stars gave him a sick and squeamish feeling, as for instance when you look at the bowels of a ripped-up beast”).

And finally, that Nabokovian joke on existentialism and academic fraud in psychology very common in his time and ours: “Incidentally, I am sending you under separate cover a pamphlet published in Prague by my friend Professor Chateau, which brilliantly refutes your Dr. Halpʼs theory of birth being an act of suicide on the part of the infant” (p. 183). The best thing of Pnin is that it is short. Now we come to the novel which I most cherish in the Nabokovian corpus and influenced me most: Pale Fire.


 

Comentarios